.Net PDF Viewer showdown


Ok, it was a simple enough feature to add. A viewer that would allow PDF’s to be shown on screen. Already in my toolkit I had the SyncFusion control, but after a couple of quick tests I found the speed to be woeful and thus started the painful process of looking for a control to use.

A number of vendors offer PDF creation, manipulation, annotations etc, but not viewing. I was most disappointed that DevExpress did not have anything in their swag, which means the project in question is now only 99% DX 😦

The list came down to

– Gnostice (www.gnostice.com)
– Atalasoft (www.atalasoft.com)
– DynamicPDF (www.dynamicpdf.com)
– Aspose (www.aspose.com)
– ActivePDF (www.activepdf.com)
– Deaja (www.daeja.com)
– Snowbound Software (snowbound.com)
– Bluebeam Q (www.bluebeam.com)
– PDFTron (www.pdftron.com)
– GDPicture (www.gdpicture.com)
– SyncFusion (www.syncfusion.com)
– O2 Solutions (www.o2sol.com)

So what was I looking for ? a .Net Assembly that could be added to my project, capable of adding a control to a WinForm to display/interact/print existing PDF’s. It would be nice to add annotations and stamps to documents someday. Whilst price had to be balanced, licensing was important. Royalty Free distribution is a must.

How would I test ? install a demo version of the product, create a viewer control on my form, set the properties, load a pdf, zoom and print. All the PDF’s tested would be live client data, the sort of thing that would be used in the final product, varying in size, content and properties. If the project could not be put together in 30minutes or less then the product was too complicated.

The litmus test is being able to do as much of the above as possible without referring to the documentation.

Round One::
Dismissed straight away because of what I thought were hideous websites were Deaja and Bluebeam. In the world of technology when your primary clients would be developers, you need something that is informative and stylish. Both these products would have been rejected on price/licensing if they had made it through round one, although to be fair, Bluebeam didn’t really fit the bill as far as a .Net library was concerned.

The list continued to get smaller as products whittled down…

Round Two::
: Snowbound – license pricing too high;
: PDFTron – restrictive licensing, too expensive;
: activePDF – confusing web site, licensing model complex and no pricing available
: DynamicPDF – restrictive licensing
: Atalasoft – PDF Reader SDK too expensive (price vs functionaltiy)

The following products made it through to testing

Round Three::
: Syncfusion – easy to implement, very slow in performance
This was the product that started me down the slippery slope of viewers, I was startled that with a $1700 price tag (for single product), the performance was dreadful.

: O2 Solutions – too hard to build a testing demo
After installing the product things look promising, until I tried to add some code. The documentation was poor, it was simply too hard to try and build the demo.

: Aspose – looked really promising, until you try and build a demo !
A single 10mb dll? I was a little surprised by how hard it was to try and create a viewer. There was nothing to add to the toolbox, the website is verbose and confusing, the forums turned up nothing. After 30minutes of trying to get something to happen I simply gave up and put it in the too hard basket.

: Gnostice – easy to implement, crashed in demo app and slow performance
The Gnostice library was easy to install and quick to implement in the project. The methods and properties were discoverable and the demo was built in a matter of minutes, unfortunately when opening one of the PDF’s we got booted with an exception, and other PDF’s were very slow.

SO THE WINNER IS…..

: GdPicture – complex product matrix, confusing mix of sdk and plugins, but FAST !
GdPicture nearly got thrown out because of the complicated product matrix, I already had a partner license so I persevered – and glad I did. It looks confusing with the large number of options available, I wasn’t sure which product I needed, or plug-ins, but GdPicture has a royalty-free license, a major plus. GdPicture installed quickly, and a test app could be produced easily. Performance was fantastic. Best of all, it did not get in the way of our interface, a simple container that allowed me to add the buttons and functionality required on the form. If it’s just PDF viewing you want then the $950 license is one of the most economical on the market, if you want what seems to be one of the most powerful image manipulation toolkits around then the ‘Ultimate’ combination is by far the best value for money.

Edit: to be clear, for the need I had, the PDF Viewer component from GdPicture was outstanding, but GdPicture offers much more, with some other 90 formats supported.

In summary, the majority of vendors seem to favour a limited license instead of a royalty free one, which was disappointing, a number seemed to think that high pricing was the way to go. I still think for wanting a basic feature there are too many hoops to jump through, especially when you consider that PDF Viewing on OS X, iOS (iPhone/iPad) is native, no additional libraries or costs required. It also seems component vendors need to think about their web sites when offering some of this stuff, it is a jungle out there.

I do hope that DevExpress have a note on a story board somewhere that shows “create pdf viewer” !

6 Responses to “.Net PDF Viewer showdown”

  1. Bob Says:

    http://www.tallcomponents.com/

    Did everything, I loved it. My billion dollar co didn’t like the price.

  2. Axel Says:

    That was helpful. Thanks. I had the *exact* same requirements.

  3. Axel Says:

    After reading the article, I decided to go with GDPicture, implemented that in a desktop product that has been distributed in june/july 2013 to thousands of desktops, showing > 60MB PDFs extremely fast, without any hiccups. Support was helpful too (found a bug under a specific XP version, was resolved within two weeks).

  4. Phil Gardocki Says:

    Paul,
    Liked your analysis, Did any of the PDF creators handle chinese characters?
    Thanks
    Phil.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: